Phils Crush, then Crumble in Loss to Twins

I’m sorry folks, I think I jinxed this one.  With former Phillie Jim Thome at the plate in the 9th inning with the Phillies up by 5 runs I said to my dad and brother, “I wouldn’t mind if he hit a home run right here.  We would still be up by three and I don’t see us losing this game.  Plus, I kinda want Thome to have more homers than that lying steroid user Rafael Palmeiro.”  That was the first time I have ever rooted for a non-Philadelphia sports player when playing a Philly sports team, and I will NEVER do that again.  Why?  Well, after Thome launched his two-run bomb that I predicted, the Phillies bullpen decided to make me look like a fool.

With a 9-6 lead the Phillies were still in a comfortable save situation, but some more poor pitching by Jose Contreras led to another run and with the score now at 9-7, Brad Lidge was called upon.  This season Brad hasn’t been used too much, but he had appeared to be over his season long slump this season, going 4/4 in save opportunities with an ERA under 2.00.  Unfortunately, 2009 Lidge showed up today.  With 2 outs and a man on, Joe Mauer came to the plate.  Lidge, who was relying on his slider, left one up over the plate and Mauer completed a dreadful top of the 9th by tying the game with a blast to right center field.  It’s safe to say that myself and the 45,000+ fans in Citizen’s Bank Park were stunned.

In the 10th more trouble ensued.  Chad Durbin came into the game and allowed a home run to Drew Butera, an unlikely hero considering he was the one who caught Thome’s home run ball while sitting in the Twins’ bullpen.  In the bottom of the inning the Phillies looked like all hope was lost when their first two batters got out very quickly, leaving the game in the hands of pinch hitter Ross Gload.  Gload, a signing that I didn’t really like, has had an unremarkable season so far off the bench.  I felt good about him coming to the plate though, because, weirdly enough, the last two times I have actually watched him bat he has hit home runs (the last time was in person when Roy Halladay got roughed up against the Red Sox).  Anyway, Gload took a low pitch and hit a scorching line drive just fair and just above the wall along the right field line to tie the game at 10.

When Danys Baez toed the mound to start the 11th inning I turned off the television because I didn’t want to watch.  Don’t ask me how the Twins scored the three runs to take a 13-10 lead because I didn’t have to watch to know what would happen.  As I have been saying since the offseason, I can’t believe we signed Baez and it is unbelievable to me that he hasn’t been designated for assignment yet.  It’s only been about 30 min since the 11th inning he should be released by now.  In four of Baez’s last five outings he has let up at least one run.  My friends and I have gotten used to seeing Baez come into a game and we would take bets on how many runs he would allow.  Amazingly enough, last time we did this was during another Cole Hamels start when Cole went seven strong innings and left with the Phillies down 2-0.  Let’s just say when Baez came in the score wasn’t 2-0 anymore.  Anyway, enough with the Baez bashing, but seriously, the guy needs to go.

Even though the Phillies blew a chance to gain a game on the Mets, who lost today, there were many positives today.  Chase Utley definitely looks like he is out of his slump, going 3/5 with 3 RBI today and 2/5 with 4 RBI yesterday.  In his last 24 games before these two he was batting .174 with 3 total RBI so it’s good to see him back.

The Phillies as a whole have been hitting great in their last four games and seem to have gotten out of their offensive funk that they’ve been in all month.  Taking two of three from the Yankees and the first game in this series while scoring in bunches shows that the Phillies have that swagger back, at least on offense.  Ryan Howard had one of the best games that I’ve ever seen him play yesterday, going 4/4 with 2 HR and was a single short of the cycle (he also added a home run today).  Jayson Werth has been batting over .300 in the last week and seems to have found his swing, hitting a home run today.  Raul Ibanez even is hitting well, crushing a ball to deep right-center field today.

All in all, it seems like the 2010 Phillies have reverted back to the 2009 Phillies, but with better starting pitching.  The offense is back to their run scoring ways, and even though it’s only been four games, you can tell that they are taking better swings and look more in control at the plate.  The bullpen seems to be back to it’s unpredictable self, so we have to hope that Ryan Madson can come back soon and pray Danys Baez is on a plane to somewhere far from the Phillies pitcher’s mound.  The one difference with both seasons, the Braves and Mets are much improved, as is our starting pitching.  Roy Halladay has been what Cliff Lee was, but even more so.  Cole Hamels looked great today after the 1st and he was solid in his last start so he looks like he has confidence back.  Hopefully J.A. Happ can come back and contribute but if not, Kyle Kendrick has been excellent.  Moyer and Blanton have been Jekyll and Hyde on the mound, but you’re bound to see that with a 47 year old pitcher.  Unfortunately, the ending of today’s game flat out sucked, but the team has its swagger back, let’s hope the 9th inning didn’t put out the spark that the Phillies just lit.

7 comments so far

Gonna Fly Now: A Recap of the Flyers Historic Run to the Finals

Section 121 for Game 6 of the Finals

Section 121 for Game 6 of the Finals

First things first, I want to congratulate the Philadelphia Flyers on taking me and all Philly sports fans on a fantastic ride that just fell short of the ultimate goal.  As disappointed as I am in losing the Cup on home ice, I am thankful for the way this team played hockey, for how they inspired us all to believe, and how they believed in themselves and overcame tremendous obstacles to get as far as they did.  The grit and toughness that the Flyers played with in the playoffs truly reflects the mentality of the city of Philadelphia, and like the Broad Street Bullies, this team should be embraced by the fans.

Boucher stops Jokinens Shootout Attempt

Boucher stops Jokinens Shootout Attempt

On April 11th I was pacing frantically in a bar in Dublin, Ireland while a random person I had met (who happened to be a Rangers fan) was getting updates on his phone from his wife back at home.  After he told me that we were going to a shootout I was terrified.  The season was coming down to a simple practice drill, and the Flyers simply weren’t that good, unless the picked the right guys.  Turns out, two of the guys they chose, Danny Briere and Claude Giroux, were the two players that were right for the job, and the only ones on the team that I trusted in a shootout.  When Boosh made the final save and the Flyers secured a playoff spot I ran around the bar in a giddy happiness that I hadn’t experienced since the Phillies clinched the Pennant.
At that time who knew what the Flyers had in store for us Philly fans?  They squeaked into the playoffs on the last shot of the regular season.  They got lucky because Montreal lost to Toronto on the last day of the season, catapulting the Flyers into 7th place where they would face the Devils, a team we went 5-1 against in the regular season and matched up with very well, instead of the President’s Trophy winning Capitals.  All season we knew that this team had the talent to make it to the Finals, but through a season riddled with injuries, excessive partying, fighting, discontent, discord in the locker room among young guys and veterans, and a coaching change, the Flyers were an enigma.  Luckily for us, the team finally came together under Peter Laviolette’s magnificent coaching and beat the Devils in 5 games.

On to the Boston series, a seven game battle that I’m sure no hockey fan will ever forget.  Games 1 and 2 could’ve easily been in the Flyers favor.  When we went down 3-0 I was crushed, but after watching the first few games I still had hope because they really weren’t bad losses.  The Flyers knew that if they played Flyers hockey they still had a shot, and boy did they deliver!  Game 4 was as close as any, and Simon Gagne’s game winner in OT gave the Flyers the spark they needed.  In Games 5 and 6 it was apparent that the Flyers weren’t going down without a fight, bringing us to one of the best games in Flyers history, Game 7.  Down 3-0 in the 1st period and at one point down 3-0 in the series, it looked like the Flyers were dead in the water, but a goal by James van Reimsdyk at the end of the period cut the deficit to 3-1 and gave the Flyers faithful a glimmer of hope.

One thing that I hated throughout the playoffs this season was the fact that the media was allowed into the bench during breaks in the action to interview the coaches.  If I was an NHL coach I wouldn’t allow this because, well, I’m trying to coach my team in the playoffs and I don’t need to waste 30 seconds talking to the media, but anyway, my point is this: Peter Laviolette’s coaching style and intensity translated to the way the Flyers played hockey.  This was never more apparent than when he was interviewed at the start of the 2nd period in Game 7 against Boston.  Down 3-1 they asked him what he thought about the deficit and if he thought his team was out of it.  Laviolette’s reply was simple: we aren’t done, it’s only 3-1, and we are going to win this game.  There was no hesitation in his voice, no sense of nervousness.  The coach knew that his team was going to win, and best of all, I believed him, and the Flyers did as well!

Peter Laviolettes energy fires up the Flyers

Peter Laviolette's energy fires up the Flyers

So after accomplishing the near impossible feat of coming back from a 3-0 deficit, the Flyers’ cinderella run met a team that also had it’s fair share of upsets, the Montreal Canadiens.  Somehow the Canadiens managed to stifle the offensive powerhouses of Washington and Pittsburgh in back to back seven game series to meet the Flyers in the first Eastern Conference Finals matchup between the #7 and #8 seeds.

In this series the Flyers brought the Canadiens back to earth.  The strong defense of Pronger, Carle, Timonen, and Coburn brought the red hot Mike Cammalleri to a stop while getting unbelievable goaltending from netminder Michael Leighton, the first Flyers goaltender to have three shutouts in one playoff series.  Even more remarkable was the fact that Leighton had just come back from an injury to replace the injured Brian Boucher during the Boston series and hadn’t played since March 16th.  Leighton outplayed Jaroslav Halak, the Montreal netminder who was the talk of the playoffs thus far, stopping Alexander Ovechkin of the Caps and Sidney Crosby of the Pens.  After disposing of the Canadiens, the Flyers had done the unthinkable and were going to the Stanley Cup Finals for the first time in 13 years!  The team was brimming with confidence, so much so that Captain Mike Richards even dared to not just touch, but lift the Prince of Wales Trophy, the award for becoming the Eastern Conference Champions.

Heading into the Finals I knew three things.  One, that the Blackhawks were better than us.  They were more talented, younger, and played in a tougher conference.  On the other hand, I knew that the Flyers were on a run unlike anything I had ever seen before.  I knew we had veteran leadership and had the only player in the series who had won a cup in Chris Pronger.  I also knew that Antti Niemi was able to be beaten, and if we played Flyers hockey, then we could pull off the upset.  Finally, I knew that based on their styles of play and the lack of proven goaltending that this series would be high scoring and momentum would play a huge factor.

Game 1, in a nutshell, was a fiasco.  The NHL loved the 6-5 affair because even non-hockey fans understood when the puck went into the net, and if I had no rooting interest it would’ve been a ton of fun to watch, but from the standpoint of a Flyers fan, Game 1 was the series.  If the Flyers could’ve played some form of defense throughout the game it was there for the taking, but instead they let it slip away, allowing Chicago to keep home ice advantage, something that controlled the series.  Game 2 was played how hockey is supposed to be played, with strong defense and goaltending.  Erase 28 seconds of that game and throw in some bounces that go our way, and the Flyers could’ve taken that game too, but hey, that’s hockey.  At this point the Flyers are in a 2-0 hole to the best team in the NHL, but based on how they played they easily could’ve been in that position, or easily tied at 1.  At least we were heading home for games 3 and 4, so I wasn’t too worried yet.

In front of the Wachovia Center faithful clad in orange the Flyers showed how they made it here.  They made the Blackhawks look slow.  They out-hustled them to every puck.  Most of all, they showed us that they weren’t going to let Chicago win in a cakewalk.  This was a series again!  After winning Game 3 in overtime on a goal by Giroux the Flyers had life, and they jumped on the Blackhawks in Game 4 en route to a 5-3 victory, sending the series back to Chicago tied at 2.

Unfortunately for the Flyers, home ice advantage really showed during the series, and the Blackhawks took advantage of every mistake that the Flyers made in Game 5.  They were the quicker team and played fundamentally sound hockey, but even after they trounced the Flyers 7-4 we had hope because we still put 4 pucks in the net, and Game 6 was in our building.

Game 6 was possibly the best game I have ever been to in my life as a Flyers fan.  The atmosphere was electric.  The Phillies game across the street got rained out, so the World Champs themselves decided to watch some hockey action.  Even the Phanatic joined in on the Flyers Fever.  When Lauren Hart and Kate Smith belted out “God Bless America” there was no doubt in my mind that we would lose.  During the game it was apparent that the Blackhawks were the fresher team.  The Flyers looked slower and more tired apart from the line of Briere (who should’ve won the Conn Smythe in my opinion), Hartnell, and Leino.

In the 1st period the Flyers withstood a barrage of shots and opportunities from Chicago, getting some lucky bounces in the process of being outshot 17-3 at one point.  After Chicago scored and kept the momentum going it looked hopeless, but with under a minute left in the period Scott Hartnell did what he does best and parked himself infront of the net and scored, tying the game at one a piece.  In the 2nd period the Flyers showed the spirit we had seen from them during their remarkable run and took the lead 2-1, but shortly after the goal Braydon Coburn committed a high sticking penalty that the crowd didn’t even see or hear, turning the momentum back over to the Blackhawks, who scored during a 4 on 4 opportunity while he was in the box.  After adding a late period goal the Blackhawks went into the locker room up 3-2, and the Flyers knew that they had to win the 3rd period to keep their season alive.  The 3rd period saw many chances for the Flyers, with pucks flying across the ice, but Philly simply couldn’t get the puck through to Niemi.  Finally, with under 4 minutes left in regulation time, Scott Hartnell provided some more magic and tied the game at three.  The Flyers had the momentum back and just missed winning the game before the buzzer went off.  We were going to sudden death overtime.

My state of mind, probably like many Flyers fans, was one of euphoria mixed with total fear and terror.  Either the Flyers score and we go to Game 7, or the Blackhawks will be hoisting the Stanley Cup on our ice.  In the first couple of minutes of the overtime it looked like the Flyers would be taking the game.  They had control of the puck and just missed putting the puck past Niemi, but, like in Game 2, it just wasn’t happening.  Then, with 15:54 left in the first overtime, it was all over.  As a fan in the Wachovia Center that night I can tell you one thing, none of the 20,327 fans knew what happened.  The light didn’t go on.  The refs didn’t signal for a goal.  All we saw was Patrick Kane throw the puck towards the net, and then a few seconds of confusion before sticks, helmets, and gloves went flying.  It didn’t take long for them to review the play and it was obviously a good goal.

Watching them parade the Cup around the Wachovia center was like a punch to the gut for me, especially when you think back to the 2007 draft when the Flyers were poised to pick Patrick Kane, but lost the draft lottery to the Blackhawks.  Kane, who, if not for a coin flip, could have been wearing Orange and Black that night, instead put the puck past Michael Leighton and sent a dagger of pain into all of our hearts.  The Flyers gave it their all, fought as hard as they could, and the team that put an entire city on it’s back from April 11th until June 9th knew that they had done something that NOBODY expected them to do, except maybe themselves.  They went from a team that was one shot away from making the playoffs to losing the Stanley Cup Finals on one of the strangest goals I have ever seen in overtime of Game 6.  It was a remarkable run, and we should all be thankful to have witnessed it.  History was made this season, and this team will be back.  History will be made.

4 comments so far

The Allen Iverson Saga

Hey guys! My name is Imran Farooqui and I’m a junior at Penn State. While Dave is about to go study abroad in Italy, I’m going to start helping out with the blog and give my insight on Philly sports, the good, the bad and the ugly.

Today I’m going to talk about the infamous Philadelphia superstar, Allen Iverson. Allen Iverson is one of the most controversial athletes that Philadelphia has ever seen, whether it was his on-court display of skills or off-court problems and dilemmas. Iverson would always keep us entertained and for that he was a very revered member of the Philadelphia elite athletes. In the late 1990s to early 2000s, Allen Iverson’s prolific scoring and his ability to carry a team on his shoulders drew national attention and his abilities helped the Sixers reach their first NBA finals in 2001, after about 15 years.

Off the court, Allen Iverson went through a roller coaster of family controversies, famous press moments or even his rapping days (not his brightest days). If you even follow basketball, you must remember the infamous “Practice” press conference that Allen Iverson had after he was benched for not coming to practice a couple times. Forever now, ESPN uses that press conference in conjunction with any situation that an NBA superstar goes through, just as a mockery. Allen Iverson will also be known for his use of firearms in front of regular citizens and even his one album that caught national acclaim for let’s say one day (Check out the one song he had “40 bars”). His tattoos define him, as he said once, and I believe that they also show his rebellious side. No matter what, Philadelphia still loved him.

The 10 years that Allen Iverson had with the Philadelphia 76ers was an up and down time. Each year, the Sixers front staff would try and pair him with a player, a scorer of sorts, that they thought would help their team in the end make it to the top. The list, in order of playing time with the 76ers, is Jerry Stackhouse, Derrick Coleman, Larry Hughes, Toni Kukoc, Keith Van Horn, Glenn Robinson, Chris Webber, and Andre Iguodala. Each player, before they became a part of the 76ers, was a great scorer and a presence in the NBA. However, each time they played with Allen Iverson would falter. The only time that it did not was that 2001 season when the starting lineup for the Sixers was Dikembe Mutombo, Tyrone Hill, Toni Kukoc, Eric Snow, and Allen Iverson. Allen Iverson would be too much of a factor for the team that the other players had to step aside in order to let him shine. It was a one-man show for Philadelphia and his name was A.I.

When the front office staff decided that enough was enough, Iverson was traded to Denver, where he was paired with Carmelo Anthony, another prolific scorer. However, the same story happened in Denver. The team could not handle two mega-superstars and though they went through the season and made it to the playoffs, they couldn’t coexist and were bounced immediately. Iverson’s tumultuous career continued onto Detroit and then a brief stint in Memphis before he realized what was happening, that he was not wanted anymore in this league and that he was falling out of the elite status of the NBA that he had for so long.

A month ago, the Sixers front office, after seeing one of the worst starts in franchise history and also the worst attendance amount in franchise history, decided they needed a boost in everything about the Sixers. When they saw A.I. on the market, they decided he could be their inspiration and maybe doing something magical for the team.

Now, after reading all of this, you may think that I dislike Allen Iverson and that I’ve never been a fan of his. It is however the opposite. I was always a huge fan of the way Allen Iverson played and he is one of my favorite players of all time. However, I feel that he has drawn out his career too much and that he has not learned how to handle being older and still playing in the NBA. The old veterans of the NBA start understanding their place in the NBA by instead of running the show, helping run it. For example, Shaquille O’Neal is a great example of someone who was a dominant force in the NBA but is now an athlete who knows he’s a piece of the puzzle instead of the main cornerstone and he works towards the bigger goal.

I also don’t like that the Sixers use Allen Iverson to only stir marketing and attendance points. The use of him as a one-hit wonder is unfortunate and just tarnishes his career evermore. I will always remember Allen Iverson as his former self and I hope that he can find his place in the NBA and keep his Hall of Fame career intact.

Feel free to comment on this and I hope to post more on the BroadStreetHeroes blog for you guys. Have a great holiday season and a happy new year!!

Imran

8 comments so far

Swapping Aces: What’s the Deal?

Were going to miss you Cliff

We're going to miss you Cliff

Update: After endless hours of changing stories the picture is starting to become clearer.  Essentially, the Phillies are making two trades:

- Trade #1: Phillies receive Roy Halladay and $6 million from the Blue Jays in exchange for Kyle Drabek, Michael Taylor, and Travis D’Arnaud

- Trade #2: Phillies trade Cliff Lee to the Mariners in exchange for Phillippe Aumont, Tyson Gillies, and a prospect to be named

What baffles me in this scenario is Trade #2.  It doesn’t make any sense!  The Phillies are making two completely separate trades which is much different than the earlier scenario of them using the Mariners to receive prospects that they could pawn off to the Blue Jays for Halladay.  In this scenario the Phillies are trading Cliff Lee and three prospects (essentially 7 prospects if you count the four that we gave the Indians for Lee in July) for Roy Halladay, two prospects, and $6 million.  That is an awefully steep price to pay even though Halladay is perhaps the best pitcher in the game.

My main concern is the Phillies reasoning for depleting their farm system for a slight upgrade.  I’m aware that Cliff Lee wants to test free agency after the 2010 season and he will cost an arm and a leg if that happens so it’s best to lock up the best starting pitcher for a few years over taking the chance that Lee wouldn’t resign.  I understood the trade and why everything was happening the way it was until a few of the remaining pieces were divulged: the $6 million, Kyle Drabek, and the fact that they were two SEPARATE trades!

The Phillies are concerned about their payroll, which they should be since it would approach $160 million with Halladay and Lee, but hear me out here.  The Blue Jays are giving us $6 million.  Joe Blanton has one year left on his deal and his contract is at $7 million for the 2010 season.  Cliff Lee is set to make $9 million in 2010.  Why wouldn’t the Phillies just deal Blanton and keep Lee?  They would be $4 million better off and would have the most dominant pitching staff in the major leagues with Lee, Halladay, Hamels, Happ, and a 5th starter that is still TBD.

It just doesn’t make sense to me that the Phillies wouldn’t go all out for 2010 and work to keep Lee in the mix for this season!  The World Series showed us that the Phillies need two dominant starters to beat a team like the Yankees and keeping Lee in the fold would do give us that.  If Halladay is ready to sign a 3-4 year extension then why should he care if we keep Lee for 2010?  I doubt he would want the team to be worse considering he has never been to the playoffs in his career and would love to get a World Series ring before hanging up his cleats.

If you were Ruben Amaro, Jr. and you had to make this decision would you put together the best team you possibly could, or would you settle for 2nd best?  I know what I would do, but hey, I’m not the GM.

No comments yet

A Message to All Spammers

Stop Spamming my blog!  This is ridiculous.  I should not have to deal with deleting over 8,000 spam messages on this blog.  Stop it now.  Thank you.

3 comments so far